Not sure what brought on this rant but.
I've dealt with data most of my life in the nuclear word on a different level then most of these shit surveys.
If you know anything about it then you know full well how the results can be manipulated . You know shit in shit out. So over the years I have learned not to take any of this seriously unless I know a hell of a lot more about how and what went in. My example in the post was the claim there had been 18 school shooting this year which is a "lie" because of the way this anti 2nd organisation classified a school shooting.
https://reason.com/blog/2018/02/16/there-havent-been-18-school-shootings
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...1d91fcec3fe_story.html?utm_term=.5710d7602b6f
https://www.investors.com/politics/...18-school-shootings-this-year-not-even-close/
Also my distrust of this type of thing includes one that support things I support. Like the number of times guns are used in the US for self-defense a year. The NRA says 2.5 million and the Clinton study said about 1.5 million but both numbers are not fact just best guess using the data as they collected it by the means they used.
Yes the 2nd was intended to allow civilian the use of miltary weapons so they could be called to arms if needed. Over the years we have restricted that or infringed on that right and it has been excepted due to changes in arms and the courts.
I have to go to work but I will address your other points as they pertain to me as son as I have time.