All time and skillwise, Fedor > GSP (updated)

Claude

Red Belt
@red
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
9,766
Reaction score
1,401
Skillwise:

-For a decade Fedor was skilled enough to stand and outstrike elite strikers like Mirko Crocop and Hunt Mark Hunt. He was also good enough to be inside Nogs guard for entire fights.

2db5d10.jpg


JadedVigilantAtlanticsharpnosepuffer.gif


WillingGregariousEarthworm-size_restricted.gif


22-Fedor-Emelianenko-vs-Antnio-Rodrigo-Nogueira.gif


20+Fedor+Emelianenko+vs+Kevin+Randleman_xvid_003.gif


200.gif


-GSP on the other hand played it safe and took strikers to the ground. He also often shot for take downs just to score points.

ufc100gspalves6.gif


10002668.jpg


-It took GSP 50 seconds to shoot for a TD vs. Alves
-It took GSP 13 seconds to shoot for a TD vs. Hendricks
-It took GSP 6 seconds to shoot for a TD vs. Diaz
-It took GSP 3 seconds to shoot for a TD vs. Fitch


-GSP kept it standing with bjj fighters like Shields and greased for BJ Penn.

shieldseyepoke03.gif


I think we can all agree that GSP mostly stayed away from his opponents' strengths while prime Fedor didn't. He was good enough to outclass them at their own game.

Prime Fedor was also skilled enough not to have a slip in 10 years, hardly even conceding a round and not once getting knocked down in his decade of dominance.

GSP on the other hand got armbarred by a wrestler, TKO'd by a low tier LW bjj fighter and got dropped several times during his prime/reign.

It took Fedor a decade before getting tapped out. GSP on the other hand:

hughesarmbarsgsp.gif


How many years did it take to finally see Fedor like this?:

matt-serra_georges-st-pierre.gif


It took Fedor over 15 years to finally get knocked down (at heavyweight) by a strike. GSP however:

Carlos_Condit_Head_Kicks_Georges_St._Pierre_UFC_154.gif


gspserra2.gif



Fedor was skilled enough to finish his fights, while GSP barely ever finished a fight in his prime.

All in all, prime for prime, GSP was:

-Outstruck more than Fedor, who was never outstruck during his reign
-Dropped more than Fedor, who was never dropped during his reign
-Subbed more than Fedor, who was subbed after 10 years
-Beaten more times than Fedor, who was beaten after 10 years
-Got hurt, rocked, and took more damage than Fedor during his reign
-And failed to finish more fights (after getting to the top only 31% of GSP's wins were finishes)


Skillwise, Fedor > GSP. Fedor was simply better and less flawed.

Resumes:

Now when it comes to resumes, the only argument GSP fans have is that he supposedly fought better competition in a stacked division...

WW was so good that Dan Hardy became the #4 ranked WW in the world. Do you know how he earned that high ranking spot? He decisioned Mike Swick, who was ranked #7. Voilá. There's an "elite" top 5 win for GSP.

An elite top 5 GSP win:

Dan-Hardy.jpg


Meanwhile Mark Hunt defeated top 5 Crocop, and he was only ranked #9 when he fought Fedor. Brett Rogers who KO'd #2 Arlovski was only ranked #6.

Going back to the stacked WW division, Nick Diaz didn't have a top win for 6 years, then he decisioned #9 BJ Penn. Voilá, another top 5 win for GSP.

Beating a barely top ranked Bj Penn is the reason several of GSP's opponents became top 5

bj-penn-ufc-137.jpg


Matt Serra is another top 5 "elite" win in GSP's record. Reason being, GSP made him top 5.... by losing to him. Add another one to the list.

20131219123047_matt_serra.jpg

We're always told the WW division was vastly superior to HW, and yet WW fighters were getting handed elite top 5 ranking spots with minimal effort compared to HW. As the examples above prove, a low end top 10 win was enough for a WW to crack the top 5. On the other hand a HW could beat a top 5 opponent and still not become top 5. WW was tougher, yet it was easier to become elite? How does that work?

That pretty much proves that GSP's top 5 wins argument is in fact a completely flawed argument. Fedor fought tougher competition than GSP. Actually Nogueira alone > anyone on GSP's record.

Fedor's accomplishments:

-10 years undefeated at HW
-27 win streak
-More than 7 years in a row ranked #1
-Defended his #1 HW ranking spot 18 times
-At least 12 top ranked wins
-Multiple time world champion under different orgs. and rules:

*Rings Openweight Championship
*Rings Absolute Class tournament winner
*Pride HW champion
*Pride HW Grand Prix world champion

*WAMMA HW champion
-Over 70% of his wins were finishes


All without conceding a single round, getting outstruck or dropped, cutting weight or failing drug tests.


Now Fedor did lose when past prime and never got back to the top, while GSP avenged all of his losses. However when you lose during your prime it is a lot easier to get back to the top as opposed to when you're completely past it. So not a good argument.

P.S. Let's be honest, Fedor choking 265 lbs Tim Sylvia in 36 seconds > GSP choking out Bisping at 185. Still good win from GSP.

fedor-emelianenko_tim-sylvia.gif


I hope you enjoyed this nice read. I expect nothing but polite replies specially from GSP fans.

Cheers.
 
Last edited:
Upcoming angry fanboy replies:

"Didn't read. Fedor fought cans"
Refute: GSP lost to a can. Apparetly beating cans is not that easy since GSP failed at it. Plus Fedor fought up to 5 times a year, but his schedule vs top opponents was as good as a UFC champion. Here:

Fedor's schedule vs top fighters was similar to Anderson Silva's, who's the longest reigning UFC champion ever:

Anderson Silva's top wins per year in the UFC:

2006: 1
2007:2
2008:1
2009:2
2010: 2
2011:2
2012: 1

Average: 1.5 top fighters per year

Fedor's top wins per year while not in the UFC:

2002: 2
2003: 2
2004: 3
2005: 1
2006:1
2007: 1
2008: 1
2009: 2

Average: 1.6 top fighters per year

The only difference is that Fedor fought up to 5 times a year while UFC champions rarely fight more than 3. Fedor fought some lower tier opponents in between his top wins which isn't a bad thing since he was active and payday wasn't as good back then. The fact that he fought more was in fact riskier as anybody can lose any given night. Remember GSP lost to a low tier fihgter. Not to an elite fighter, not to a champion, not to a great fighter. A low tier.

"GSP has more top wins"
Refute: As stated in the thread, WW awarded top ranking spots easier than HW

"Fedor vs Hendo/Werdum/Bigfoot/Maldonado gif"
Refute: Prime GSP tapping to Serra .gif

"Fedor lost to a MW"
Refute: GSP lost to a LW, in his prime

"GSP won belts at WW and MW"
Refute: Fedor didn't need to cut weight. He was good enough to give up a significant size advantage.

"GSP had more title defenses"
Refute: In Pride, not every fight from the champ was a title fight. Fedor defended his #1 spot more times and remained unbeaten for longer though.

"Fedor didn't fight in the UFC"
Refute: Fedor always fought in the toughest HW divisions while he was top ranked: Pride, Affliction and Strikeforce all had better HW's than the UFC. By the time the UFC signed the best HW's by adquiring Strikeforce, Fedor was already unranked and looking at retirement.

"Fedor is GOAT"
Refute: None

CleanGreatBufeo.gif
 
Last edited:
Didn't Read

Fedor fought the most cans in the history of that sport.


Go away
 
Fedor has 1 title fight finish, unless you count his made up WAMMA belt. And it was against a short notice opponent.

That's the same amount Georges has at MW.

I see you trying to cherry pick GSP's record and that's the best you got? Fedor fought 3? 4? pro wrestlers? A zulu?

I can only imagine what you dorks would have believed GSP was capable of if he fought CM Punk and Sage Northcutt between title fights.

Fedor is a benefactor of goofy showcase fights, and slow, lumbering fighters.
 
Fedor is GSP's only real contender for GOAT, but GSP is still #1.
 
Did it take you all day to come up with this. These post whore noobs lol
 
Didn't read. GSP is way more skilled and he hasn't ruined his legacy post prime
 
I still take Fedor. I still think there was nothing like Prime Fedor, he brought an intensity and demeanour I've never seen before and was the king of an historically volatile division for a decade, eventually fighting massive weight discrepancies against monsters took its toll, but anyone can look back at Fedors finest performances against P4P greats like Big Nog and Cro Cop and see he was special.

GSP is obviously right up there, and I could also make the case for him, but for me Fedor is still THE GOAT.
 
Didn't read. GSP is way more skilled and he hasn't ruined his legacy post prime

Yet.

He isn't more skilled as he had a lot more setbacks during his prime.

Prime for prime GSP was:

Oustruck more
Hurt more
Dropped more
Subbed more
Beaten more

Just facts.

Cheers.
 
Last edited:
- PRIDE rules were better than the shitty UFC ones.
- Being undefeated for 10 years in heavyweight division is harder than beating WWs and bloated LWs.

Fedor is the GOAT.
 
Yet.

He isn't more skilled as he had a lot more slips during his prime.

Cheers.
I'd consider his prime to be around the 2nd Serra fight. He became way more dominant in that period than his initial run to the title. GSP is WAY more complete and better at every individual aspect. Fedor fought cans and in an organization with rigged fights.
 
Fedor has 1 title fight finish, unless you count his made up WAMMA belt. And it was against a short notice opponent.

That's the same amount Georges has at MW.

I see you trying to cherry pick GSP's record and that's the best you got? Fedor fought 3? 4? pro wrestlers? A zulu?

I can only imagine what you dorks would have believed GSP was capable of if he fought CM Punk and Sage Northcutt between title fights.

Fedor is a benefactor of goofy showcase fights, and slow, lumbering fighters.

Already refuted.
 
GSP's level of competition was better. If he had shitty single dimensional opponents, he'd also have many more finishes.
 
GSP is WAY more complete and better at every individual aspect. Fedor fought cans and in an organization with rigged fights

Facts disagree.

GSP couldn't remain unbeaten for 10 years. Let alone not lose a round.
 
Back
Top