- Joined
- May 29, 2013
- Messages
- 21,005
- Reaction score
- 2
As a catholic, that's a pretty rediculous use of that quote bud
"Let he that is without sin be the first to cast the stone" rhetoric is 100% moral parable, not a theological lesson on how to structure legal systems
You can't be full blown "self governance" in a cohabitative world with impacts larger than the individual ethics system, that's the lesson learned by the formation of all kinds of laws and regulations extending influence on an international scale. You don't get to gas your citizens because you are king of the kingdom anymore.
Take environmental laws: any given country's low emissions standards and environmental deregulation can literally poison separate countries that they share a border with, not unlike how any one individual's ethics system can negatively impact other individuals who share their living environment.
Then take morality and ethics into extension of this relationship: if you believe murder is justified when you feel x, y or z about something, there are laws that step in and take that judgement call away from you. "Judge not" is a fucking insane way to structure lawmaking and oversight in hundreds of industries that decided to regulate in modernizing eras, often in the wake of massive disasters highlighting that gap in supervision (see the history of fire codes, health codes, factory codes, the list goes on and on)
You can debate the conditions of a "judgement" (or law) fully, that ability needs protecting, but don't try to spin armchair theology bullshit to convince posters that "to judge" actions in the world is off the table of discussion, that's some Dr Doom shit
I wasn't applying it to the law. I was applying it to people who feel they need to punish people for moral sins that they think the law doesn't cover.