- Joined
- Dec 8, 2011
- Messages
- 24,977
- Reaction score
- 1,193
And full employment, growth and just about every metric.If by very well you mean the Dow being flat from July of 14, sure...
Again, he gets a B-. Not bad, could have been much worse.
And full employment, growth and just about every metric.If by very well you mean the Dow being flat from July of 14, sure...
Again, he gets a B-. Not bad, could have been much worse.
And full employment, growth and just about every metric.
Not really debatable, full employment is well defined. It's only debatable if you want to change definitions or how it's calculated, which is obviously slimy.Actually, it’s debatable that Obama ever reached full employment. However I absolutely give him credit for the firm ground the Trump bump launched from.
Also, you’re reaching on the every metric line as well. I could easily cherry pick some ugly numbers, as you could with any presidency.
Not really debatable, full employment is well defined. It's only debatable if you want to change definitions or how it's calculated, which is obviously slimy.
And I didn't argue every single indicator is great, but the ones we use to say the economy is doing well or not.
I'm talking one of the best recoveries in the world after one of the worst financial crisis ever. Even spearheading the recovery for many other countries.When you say "awesome recovery", are you referring to the slowest recovery to a recession in US history?
And they’re going to have to do it again only it may be more difficult this time.I'm talking one of the best recoveries in the world after one of the worst financial crisis ever. Even spearheading the recovery for many other countries.
Cleaning up after republitards as usual.
Lol, I'm still offering avatar, or sig bets to anyone that thinks he will win re-election.