- Joined
- Aug 25, 2016
- Messages
- 7,229
- Reaction score
- 4,141
From reading this forum you'd think Tony fought the best opponents in ufc history and all Khabib fought was taxi drivers. But the guys they've fought have been super similar.
Tony's beaten Lando, Trujillo, RDA, Tibau, Barboza, Castillo, Thomson, Lee and is said to have "destroyed everyone in the division".
But when Khabib's beaten Healy, Barboza, Trujillo, RDA, Tibau, Johnson (who beat Tony), Iaquinta (who beat Lee) he's said to have only fought bums.
Not saying Khabib has a better resume, but it's definitely close. Yet you'd think Ferguson's resume was a hundred times better from how people talk about it. Can someone explain to me why Tony's opposition gets held in such a higher regard?
Tony's beaten Lando, Trujillo, RDA, Tibau, Barboza, Castillo, Thomson, Lee and is said to have "destroyed everyone in the division".
But when Khabib's beaten Healy, Barboza, Trujillo, RDA, Tibau, Johnson (who beat Tony), Iaquinta (who beat Lee) he's said to have only fought bums.
Not saying Khabib has a better resume, but it's definitely close. Yet you'd think Ferguson's resume was a hundred times better from how people talk about it. Can someone explain to me why Tony's opposition gets held in such a higher regard?
Last edited: