Mali Kawa: Jones snitched on himself to get reduced sentence

Newave

Green Belt
@Green
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
0
Im paraphrasing. His exact words on the mma hour

“Substantial assistance doesn’t mean it has to be on anybody else it could be on themselves.” At 158:30 in the show

And on Ariel Helwani “There’s things that they got from Jon about Jon that they never had before.” At 36:30 in the show.

But in the same podcast he says Jones has never taken PEDs? How does that make sense?
 
Jones has known since day 1 that he was set up. He wanted to handle it himself, but ultimately decided to snitch on whoever it was that set him up. I think it was the right choice. Jones Bless.
 
I'm not going to listen, nor believe a thing Malki says, but there's no way Jones got a 30 month reduction for snitching on himself. They didn't need his assistance to suspend him, they already had all the info they needed.
 
LMAO, how the fuck do you snitch on yourself and claim your innocent at the same time. More importantly, how does USADA approve of this logic? LOL
 
Everyone is going assume Jones will lose his next fight off the juice.. He will win like always.. Then (Holds breath).
 
LOL

So after lying non-stop during the hearing, he finally just fessed up? And for that they gave him a love tap on the wrist?

This whole thing is so far beyond shady it's become Circus Vargas levels at this stage.

UFC and UFRAUDa running a 3 Ring Circus, with their clown leader, Pink Goofapotomus.
 
It only makes sense if Jon Jones was living under witness protection and he snitched on the federal government or drug cartels that he used to associate with.
 
Snitched on himself essentially would mean hes guilty, which we all know he is but thats not something he should be throwing out there as Jones manager.
 
Last edited:
Probably about the coke and weed
 
Proof that Jones is innocent, you dont snitch on yourself if you're guilty.

<JonesLaugh>
 
It's all a dirty cover up. Isn't it obvious by now with all the untied loose ends?
 
Im paraphrasing. His exact words on the mma hour

“Substantial assistance doesn’t mean it has to be on anybody else it could be on themselves.” At 158:30 in the show

hes talking utter bollocks

its clearly stated in the arbitration report that it is article 10.6.1.1

Dn4Vj7WXUAU4WSY



10.6.1.1 clearly states it has to be information on another person. it clearly says it, in both situations, that is has to be on "ANOTHER PERSON"

Dn4J8ypXUAAfAXq


Malki is full of shit.

both myself and Iain Kidd have called him out on his bullshit and hes now claiming he needs to read the agreement and the arbitration report again..

fucking moron doesnt even know what Jon signed and agreed to.



Malki also claimed that he doesnt think Jon has to give information to USADA on an ongoing basis, despite the arbitrators report clearly stating "a continuing duty of cooperation"

Dn4OFmQXoAADNKO






Malki's best line was that if Jacksons gets raided next week and seven fighters get busted "It wont be because of anything Jon said"
 
Then what are you snitching about?
Isnt it obvious? That he wasnt juicing, but may have been given something by a nerd like Colby or something, next dude that gets suspended definitely spiked Jones' protein.
 
Back
Top