Who the heck runs the UFC's Twitter account? It's biased as f**k! Check this out...

Why did you make a thread about another thread from 2 years ago?
 
Need them to post Conor vs Nate 1 to prove unbias
 
It was also a badass fight where both headhunted and hurt each other multiple times.

Dont see a problem with them promoting it.
 
Marquardt was headlining the fight pass prelims. Thats why it was posted by UFC fight pass.
 
Lol @ tell about the TRT exemption. As if he was just on vitamins and gatorade.
 
So if you're UFC Champion then your losses shouldn't be used to promote other fighters?

Does the UFC ignore the Miocic win when promoting Struve? Or the Whittaker win when promoting Thompson? Or the Dillashaw win when promoting Dodson? etc.

You also just posted this in another thread. It didn't deserve it's own thread.
 
that account is often used to trigger people...clearly it works :D
 
TS explained it in the OP, citing an old thread about UFC promoting Nate vs the Barncat.

They just wanted to make Nate great again.
 
They did the same with BJ.....to promote his comeback, they show him prancing in the 3rd Edgar fight.
 
Is there any proof that you need that Woodley is being treated unfairly because of his race?

SMH. This white supremacist system continues to put brothers down.
 
It's the UFC, they promote whoever can bring that casual money or they think it's a draw.
That's why legit champs are pretty much forgotten and Stipe is pissed about it.
 
I think they should show woodley getting ko'ed by nate at the contract signing stage to all new fighters to encourage expectation to finish f8ghts
 
Probably conor while dana is licking his balls in the tv truck
 
This was before Nates last fight.. that's why they were showing it
 
Back
Top