Yeah...I hear you man...fighters know they can get away with a few fence grabs...sucks for grappling-heavy fightersIt’s hard to fix judgings because of the subjectivity involved.
My beef is with refs who don’t have the balls to enforce the rules. Giving multiple warnings for the same offense is useless. It just tells the fighters that they can get away with it. Start deducting points if you want rules followed.
It’s hard to fix judgings because of the subjectivity involved.
My beef is with refs who don’t have the balls to enforce the rules. Giving multiple warnings for the same offense is useless. It just tells the fighters that they can get away with it. Start deducting points if you want rules followed.
Yeah it sucks, but you need to offer something more specific than “judging the whole fight” as an alternative.
That's terrible.each minute of the fight should get a 10 point must score
would be more complicated to do, but more fair and accurate in the end
Why do rounds at all then? In grappling tournaments, a submission only rule set is preferred by many. Why not adopt the same for MMA?
- Decision
- If the match reaches its time limit then the outcome of the bout is determined by the three judges. The fight is scored in its entirety and not round-by-round. After the third round, each judge must decide a winner. Matches cannot end in a draw. A decision is made according to the following criteria in this order of priority:
If a fight was stopped on advice of the ring doctor after an accidental but illegal action, e.g. a clash of heads, and the contest is in its second or third round, the match was decided by the judges using the same criteria.
- The effort made to finish the fight via KO or submission
- Damage given to the opponent
- Standing combinations and ground control
- Takedowns and takedown defense
- Aggressiveness
- Weight (in the case that the weight difference is 10 kg/22 lb or more)
This would shake things up. Great idea.MMA shouldn't have judging. If there's no finish it should be a draw.
Simple.