Tattooed fighters or clean cut?

Tats or not?


  • Total voters
    39

Legendary

Ꮥµpǝɹnøʌɐ
@Black
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
7,244
Reaction score
2,466
In the earlier days you had more dubious fighters in the sport. In general the sport had many ex-cons and overall lots of people from the "underworld". As the sport became more mainstream, a lot of those guys got weeded out of the major organizations, and started to fight for Blood Money Promotions.

42546420_107734.jpg

but now we have guys like this

Sage-Northcutt.jpg

Did you prefer the sport when it had all the criminals , or do you like it better now with less of them around. Basically do you care if a fighter has a criminal past or served time in prison for a violent crime?

Neck tats vs Boy band
 
Last edited:
Tattoos do seem to trigger some kind of PTSD on here.
 
Necktats or dont bother
 
I'm partial to ink because I'm bias, but if you baby oil virgin clean that's cool (no gay)
 
clean like my boy colby. tattoos are for criminals
 
I was going to say clean cut but then I saw the 2 choices. I'd rather be like Aleks than Sage.
 
I'm all for diversity. We need clean cut dudes like Sage AND savages with face tats like Platinum Mike Perry.
 
No tats for me. You don't put a bumper sticker on a Cadillac.

Besides, I've got scars all over plus a calf I tore in half. No need to pay for ink, I earned mine.
 
I base which fighters I like on what they have or do not have on their skin.

Because I'm cool like that.
 
I have never seen bumper stickers on a Lambo......
 
Back
Top