3 times in a row where Weidman was winning the 1st and then got finished in 2nd or 3rd...

TheLastEmperorReurns

TheLastEmperorReurns

Banned
Banned
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
6,308
Reaction score
354
Makes you realize that Silva would have finished him twice if it wasn't for those 2 flukes.
 
People that.

A. act like Silva was in his prime
B. Act like weidman's ko was legit and not a result of andy being a dipshit
C. Act like the broken leg was a legit win despite one dominant round in a 5 rounder

Without the jackass ko or the broken leg, we could of seen a silva sonnen2 or Silva Henderson type win for Andy.

Anyways though, if Fedor's losses at age 35 don't diminish his goat status, why in the motherfucking world should andy's losses post 37 years old hinder him.

IGNORANT SILVA HATERS OR GSP FANBOYS!!!!!!!! YOU MOTHERFUCKERS ARE WRONG ABOUT ALL OF THAT.
 
gastelum will finish weidy in the 1st.

it's sad too cause weid is pretty decent.

he got the anderson silva bad mojo curse passed along to him
 
CM 4 said:
Ha you noob Moose finished him in the 2nd
Click to expand...
Not really

Yes Moose ended up getting the TKO nod due to technicality but to claim that anyone was "finished" in that fight is just stretching it
 
Where you at Georges? said:
People that.

A. act like Silva was in his prime
B. Act like weidman's ko was legit and not a result of andy being a dipshit
C. Act like the broken leg was a legit win despite one dominant round in a 5 rounder

Without the jackass ko or the broken leg, we could of seen a silva sonnen2 or Silva Henderson type win for Andy.

Anyways though, if Fedor's losses at age 35 don't diminish his goat status, why in the motherfucking world should andy's losses post 37 years old hinder him.

IGNORANT SILVA HATERS OR GSP FANBOYS!!!!!!!! YOU MOTHERFUCKERS ARE WRONG ABOUT ALL OF THAT.
Click to expand...
Most factual thing I've ever seen. How can you deny Silva GOAT status?
 
Well if Anderson hadn't been knocked out cold, then yeah, I suppose he MIGHT have won.

Brilliant fucking logic TS.
 
Where you at Georges? said:
People that.

A. act like Silva was in his prime
B. Act like weidman's ko was legit and not a result of andy being a dipshit
C. Act like the broken leg was a legit win despite one dominant round in a 5 rounder

Without the jackass ko or the broken leg, we could of seen a silva sonnen2 or Silva Henderson type win for Andy.

Anyways though, if Fedor's losses at age 35 don't diminish his goat status, why in the motherfucking world should andy's losses post 37 years old hinder him.

IGNORANT SILVA HATERS OR GSP FANBOYS!!!!!!!! YOU MOTHERFUCKERS ARE WRONG ABOUT ALL OF THAT.
Click to expand...

1) Anderson was in his prime and was on a huge winning streak and destroying people a year before his loss.

2) Anderson's K.O. loss was legit. He got outstruck, his 2nd loss to Weidman was flukish but he was losing both the 1st and 2nd round.

3) Yoel Romero is a better fighter than Anderson Silva and would of destroyed a Prime Anderson Silva. Romero beating Weidman just means he would of destroyed Anderson.

4) Whittaker would likely beat a prime Anderson.

5) Rockhold could hold his own but styles make fights. I'd favor Anderson overall given Rockhold's chin issues and not as deadly 'explosiveness' as Romero.

6) Anderson only became out of his prime and noticeably different after he came back from his leg injury.
 
TheLastEmperorReurns said:
Makes you realize that Silva would have finished him twice if it wasn't for those 2 flukes.
Click to expand...

Yoel Romero would of destroyed a Prime Anderson.

Whittaker destroys a prime Anderson.

Rockhold could stand a good chance against a prime Anderson as could Gegard Mousasi.
 
Seaside said:
1) Anderson was in his prime and was on a huge winning streak and destroying people a year before his loss.

2) Anderson's K.O. loss was legit. He got outstruck, his 2nd loss to Weidman was flukish but he was losing both the 1st and 2nd round.

3) Yoel Romero is a better fighter than Anderson Silva and would of destroyed a Prime Anderson Silva. Romero beating Weidman just means he would of destroyed Anderson.

4) Whittaker would likely beat a prime Anderson.

5) Rockhold could hold his own but styles make fights. I'd favor Anderson overall given Rockhold's chin issues and not as deadly 'explosiveness' as Romero.

6) Anderson only became out of his prime and noticeably different after he came back from his leg injury.
Click to expand...

You are living in a fantasy land man.
 
Well, TS convinced me.

In fact, the AC might as well overturn those results and retroactively award Silva the wins.
 
Made rick franklin look like a bitch twice and newbs forget how good Ace was

Weathered the storm vs. Hendo then owned his ass on the ground, the same hendo that pushed rampage to the brink and ruined Wanderlei's career

Froze Vitor on the feet, much like he would do to whitaker in his prime then viciously ko'd him

fought with hurt ribs, roided to the gills sonnen and still gutted out the win

Made Forrest Griffin look like a regional fighter. That is saying alot guys.
 
Where you at Georges? said:
You are living in a fantasy land man.
Click to expand...

No you are.

Prime Anderson always had weakness when it came to grappling, and most importantly wrestling and ground and pound. A prime Anderson was submitted 2x and destroyed in 2x fights in Pride. Anderson Silva lost 3x before he reached the UFC. The 'GOAT' of all time in MMA isn't a guy who losses 3x in his prime.

I can excuse Anderson losing to Bisping and Cormier those performances were clearly after +15 years of combat experience and lots of injuries and wear and tear. But you are crazy to somehow excuse his 3x losses that occurred in the past before he even lost to Weidman. Also, crazy to knock off Weidman's wins.

Yoel Romero is also something far scarier to anything Anderson Silva ever faced except for Daniel Cormier. And guys like Gegard Mousasi are something he never faced either. The most dangerous fighters Anderson faced at MW and beat were Hendo, Vitor, Maia and Franklin. Now consider that everyone else was either a slow grappler who won via lots of boring UD (like Lettis, Okami, Chael) or guys were big and slow with inferior striking Forrest Griffin and Stephan Bonnar and James Irvin.

Anderson was submitted 2x both occurring 6 and 7 years into his mma career respectively and yet 2 years after that he entered the UFC and started to dominate. hmmmm you'd have to be nuts to knock his earlier losses.
 
Seaside said:
No you are.

Prime Anderson always had weakness when it came to grappling, and most importantly wrestling and ground and pound. A prime Anderson was submitted 2x and destroyed in 2x fights in Pride. Anderson Silva lost 3x before he reached the UFC. The 'GOAT' of all time in MMA isn't a guy who losses 3x in his prime.

I can excuse Anderson losing to Bisping and Cormier those performances were clearly after +15 years of combat experience and lots of injuries and wear and tear. But you are crazy to somehow excuse his 3x losses that occurred in the past before he even lost to Weidman. Also, crazy to knock off Weidman's wins.

Yoel Romero is also something far scarier to anything Anderson Silva ever faced except for Daniel Cormier. And guys like Gegard Mousasi are something he never faced either. The most dangerous fighters Anderson faced at MW and beat were Hendo, Vitor, Maia and Franklin. Now consider that everyone else was either a slow grappler who won via lots of boring UD (like Lettis, Okami, Chael) or guys were big and slow with inferior striking Forrest Griffin and Stephan Bonnar and James Irvin.

Anderson was submitted 2x both occurring 6 and 7 years into his mma career respectively and yet 2 years after that he entered the UFC and started to dominate. hmmmm you'd have to be nuts to knock his earlier losses.
Click to expand...
so who is the goat then.... GSP I assume since you are so adiment?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,708
Messages
55,436,300
Members
174,774
Latest member
kilgorevontrouty

Share this page

Back
Top