- Joined
- Feb 1, 2016
- Messages
- 2,526
- Reaction score
- 0
There is ALOT of debate of who is the MMA GOAT. And rightfully so because it's really just an opinion who you believe is the best. Now here is my question. What criteria do you personally use to determine this? There are many many things to consider here. For instance.
GSP could be the GOAT if you consider pure dominance. He literally destroyed everyone he beat. Made them look like they didn't even belong in there. Also he fought great COMPETITION. But some people don't consider him the GOAT because his fighting style can be considered by some "Boring". Kinda the Floyd Mayweather effect from boxing
Anderson Silva could be the GOAT if you consider the MANNER in wich he beat his opponents. He was a very flashy striker that KOed people dead. Also outclassed many. Sometimes looked like he was out of this world. But some people don't consider him the GOAT because he had a pretty clear weakness to his game, his wrestling, and had been taken down repeatedly in his career, Sonnen clearly dominating the first fight. He also fought lesser competiton overall compared to GSP. Also had many more losses and didn't avenge them.
Some say Fedor is the GOAT. Similiar to the other 2 candidates. His dominance was amazing. He was almost like a combination of the 2 in the sense that he dominated people, and also was a very exciting fighter to watch. Whent like 10 years unbeaten. Main objection to this is he probably faced the worst competition of them all. And also pride being notorious for not testing for PEDS, it's safe to assume he could have been on the juice.
Etc etc. So what is your own criteria you use?
GSP could be the GOAT if you consider pure dominance. He literally destroyed everyone he beat. Made them look like they didn't even belong in there. Also he fought great COMPETITION. But some people don't consider him the GOAT because his fighting style can be considered by some "Boring". Kinda the Floyd Mayweather effect from boxing
Anderson Silva could be the GOAT if you consider the MANNER in wich he beat his opponents. He was a very flashy striker that KOed people dead. Also outclassed many. Sometimes looked like he was out of this world. But some people don't consider him the GOAT because he had a pretty clear weakness to his game, his wrestling, and had been taken down repeatedly in his career, Sonnen clearly dominating the first fight. He also fought lesser competiton overall compared to GSP. Also had many more losses and didn't avenge them.
Some say Fedor is the GOAT. Similiar to the other 2 candidates. His dominance was amazing. He was almost like a combination of the 2 in the sense that he dominated people, and also was a very exciting fighter to watch. Whent like 10 years unbeaten. Main objection to this is he probably faced the worst competition of them all. And also pride being notorious for not testing for PEDS, it's safe to assume he could have been on the juice.
Etc etc. So what is your own criteria you use?