- Joined
- Mar 24, 2012
- Messages
- 27,170
- Reaction score
- 9
In another thread earlier a poster said that he only considered Overeem good, but not great. One could see an argument either way, on one hand Overeem's skills seem "great" and capable of beating anybody on a given night, on the other hand he is fairly inconsistent with notable weaknesses. What do you view as the difference between a good fighter and a great one? For example do you think a fighter who has really good skills but also a glaring weakness (eg. Overeem, Pettis, Condit) can be considered great, or only good?