JJ vs DC in pure grappling(hypothetically)

IloveTHIS

Steel Belt
@Steel
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
30,816
Reaction score
13,357
In pure wrestling/grappling. who would your money be on?
 
jones took him down 3 times and dc couldnt complete one takedown on im

DC would win a wrestling match, but jones submits blackbelts
 
tumblr_nhno82LfVq1u2ragso1_500.gif


vucj3JV.gif
 
I would put three fiddy on Jones and three forty nine on DC.
 
Grappling = JJ his long limbs will help him alot. wrestling = Cormier. cuz he a fucking olympian. mma wrestling is not the same a pure wrestling. And striking = Jones. But both are top notch well rounded fighters.
 
Jones is a juicer. off the roids cormier beats him no question.
 
Honestly who cares does anyone actually go out of there way to watch wrestling unless it's the Olympics.
We watch MMA for the excitement not for the spandex one-sees
 
Jon will always be better than DC in all aspects of combat. A dude like DC simply cannot accept that.
 
You're misremembering. It was late in the fight, but DC tossed Jones on his head.
So are you. 2:09 of the vid DC struggles to get a slam, Jones lands on all fours and if you remember got up pretty much right away.

 
Are we talking Jones with or without PEDs? With PEDS, we know Jones can stuff Cormier's takdeowns, out muscle him in the clinch, and put him on his ass when he's gassed. Without PEDs, I would say Cormier ragdolls him.
Also, without the threat of elbows, knees, spinning back fists, eye pokes etc., Cormier vs Jones pure grappling without PEDs equals Cormier vs Henderson.
 
On the mats or in the cage? Mats, Cormier. Cage, Jon.

The long limbs give him a HUGE advantage up against the cage walls.
 
Things are different with a cage and things like kicks to capitalize on and strikes to set up takedowns. Keep that in mind, mma is it's own beast.
 
Back
Top