Nate Diaz headlining Events = 1st & 3rd highest PPVs, 3rd highest FOX, 3rd highest Fight Night

CoffeeAndBeer

OG from 1993
@Silver
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
14,235
Reaction score
448
Going off of MMAPayout and Tapology.com figures...

PPVs
1) 1,650,000* -- UFC 202: McGregor vs. Nate Diaz 2
2) 1,600,000^ -- UFC 100
3) 1,317,000 -- UFC 196: McGregor vs. Nate Diaz
4) 1,300,000* -- UFC 205: McGregor vs. Alvarez
*or based on latest revision/audit, tied for 1st at *1,317,000 buys
^adjusted to 1,300,000 upon latest revision/audit


UFC on FOX
1) 5,700,000 -- UFC on FOX 1: Velasquez vs. dos Santos
2) 4,570,000 -- UFC on FOX 2: Evans vs. Davis
3) 4,400,000 -- UFC on FOX 5: Henderson vs. Nate Diaz

UFC Fight Night
1) 3,100,000 -- UFC FN 14: Silva vs. Irvin
2) 2,751,000 -- UFC FN 59: McGregor vs. Siver
3) 2,500,000 -- UFC FN 19: Nate Diaz vs. Guillard

TUF Finales since move to FS1
1) 1,130,000 -- UFC TUF 18: Nate Diaz vs. Maynard
2) 1,086,000 -- UFC TUF 23: Jędrzejczyk vs. Gadelha II



Please, someone correct me if I'm wrong on any of these figures, but please do cite the source.
 
Last edited:
Evans vs Davis got that good numbers?
That was an awful fight.
<mma4>
 
His FOX fight vs Michael Johnson was DOPE. Both me and the wife were LOLing when he was tagging & pointing at him. Was not expecting that tbh.

Diaz bros are entertaining mo-fos, despite their inconsistency. haha
 
Nate gets real high. Dana should pay him his green to fight so he can get back to lighting them up .
 
What do his top PPVs have in common... Hmmm can't quite put my finger on it...
 
It's called selective reasoning.

I can do the same thing with Holly Holm.

UFC on FOX 20
4,687,000 viewers

UFC 196
1,317,000

UFC 193
1,100,000

What are you "proving"?
 
"Nate Diaz Doesn't Move Needles" - Dana White
 
Last edited:
VCL-Gauge-Control-Value-Indicator-Animation-15-1_59548875.gif
 
...but he doesn't move the needle right? War Diaz.
 
Bit Dana said he's not a needle mover so try again TS?
 
Because McGregor had nothing to do with the PPV numbers...
 
this wont go over well with citizens from mctapperville
 
It's called selective reasoning.

I can do the same thing with Holly Holm.
UFC on FOX 20 = 4,687,000 viewers
UFC 196 = 1,317,000
UFC 193 = 1,100,000

What are you "proving"?
Sorry but lets get things CORRECT first...
- UFC on FOX 20 = 2,975,000. You posted the "peak viewership"
- Holly Holm did NOT headline UFC 196

And anyhow, Holly has shown to be a decent draw in her own right, you shat all over your own point. Holly carried her own PPV event with a no-name opponent, for a BS title, coming off 2 losses!
 
Last edited:
Food for thought...

2,404,000 = average PPV buys over the last 10 events NOT headlined by Conor, Ronda, or named "UFC 200"

Sorry but lets get things CORRECT first...
- UFC on FOX 20 = 2,975,000. You posted the "peak viewership"
- Holly Holm did NOT headline UFC 196

And anyhow, Holly has show to be a decent draw in her own right, you shat all over your own point.
Even so, all you "proved" is that you can pick and choose numbers.
 
Back
Top