Proof Yair destroys Conor or Garbrandt!

Sean Long

Master black belt of Majitney fufu
@purple
Joined
Apr 5, 2016
Messages
2,306
Reaction score
0
Let x1, …, xd be a system of parameters for R, let F• be a free R-resolution of the residue field of R with F0 = R, and let K• denote the Koszul complex of R with respect to x1, …, xd. Lift the identity map R = K0 → F0 = R to a map of complexes. Then no matter what the choice of system of parameters or lifting, the last map from R = Kd → Fd is not 0.

Any questions?
 
Yes.

For me, just the whole part before the "Any questions?"
 
i totally solved for the variable in your scenario and all roads lead to you shutting the fuck up.
 
55960977.jpg
 
Let x1, …, xd be a system of parameters for R, let F• be a free R-resolution of the residue field of R with F0 = R, and let K• denote the Koszul complex of R with respect to x1, …, xd. Lift the identity map R = K0 → F0 = R to a map of complexes. Then no matter what the choice of system of parameters or lifting, the last map from R = Kd → Fd is not 0.

Any questions?
<{cruzshake}>

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/f...stical-metric-analysis-of-intagibles.3431337/
 
Take it easy. A guy flashing all those kicks is going to be taken down.

Dont ask me why bj didnt. Jesus fucking christ.
 
Let x1, …, xd be a system of parameters for R, let F• be a free R-resolution of the residue field of R with F0 = R, and let K• denote the Koszul complex of R with respect to x1, …, xd. Lift the identity map R = K0 → F0 = R to a map of complexes. Then no matter what the choice of system of parameters or lifting, the last map from R = Kd → Fd is not 0.

Any questions?
In case you were serious.
250709.image0.jpg
 
Let x1, …, xd be a system of parameters for R, let F• be a free R-resolution of the residue field of R with F0 = R, and let K• denote the Koszul complex of R with respect to x1, …, xd. Lift the identity map R = K0 → F0 = R to a map of complexes. Then no matter what the choice of system of parameters or lifting, the last map from R = Kd → Fd is not 0.

Any questions?
Finally, someone with a brain.

Indeed, if C is a minor-closed family of finite graphs, there is a finite forbidden minor characterization of C. In particular, membership in C can be tested in polynomial time. Follows from the Robertson-Seymour theorem: the minor relation induces a well-quasi ordering on the class of all finite graphs.

Any questions?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,887
Messages
55,451,298
Members
174,783
Latest member
notnormal
Back
Top