Trivia! - Which fighter has the most wins in UFC history?

Concrete Whale

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Messages
7,310
Reaction score
0
Clue:
He or she is currently a champ.

Number of wins:
20

Answer:
michael_bisping-1406.jpg
 
Bisping

Edit : YES! THIS CASUAL KNOWS HIS SHIT!
 
Props for taking out Rockhold, but for someone as popular as Bisping, his record is a bit padded.
 
Not the losses, he mostly only lost to legit guys, but some of the wins, especially early on, weren't exactly world beaters.

View attachment 176869

As far as his 20 wins go, those are 9 of them, and most agree that he lost to Hamill.
well at that time he was just an up and coming fighter, the Hendo fight was his first title eliminator

so no, his record is not padded
 
Not the losses, he mostly only lost to legit guys, but some of the wins, especially early on, weren't exactly world beaters.

View attachment 176869

As far as his 20 wins go, those are 9 of them, and most agree that he lost to Hamill.

Fair enough, but that can be said about most fighters early in their careers, especially fighters that have been around as long as Bisping.

Leben, Kang and Miller were all good fighters for their time as was Sinosic.

(and fully agree that he straight-up lost to Hamill - Dana wanted that UK market so ... )
 
Props for taking out Rockhold, but for someone as popular as Bisping, his record is a bit padded.

If the case, then just a bit. From his UFC start as TUF winner at LHW, he put up a nice win list. And most of the 20 names are more than decent if not good/great fighters

Hendo
Rockhold
Anderson Silva
Thales Leites
Dolloway
Cung Le
Alan Belcher
Brian Stann
Jason Miller
Jorge Rivera
Akiyama
Dan Miller
Denis Kang
Chris Leben
Jason Day
Charles McCarthy
Matt Hamill
Elvis Sinosic
Eric Schafer
Josh Haynes
 
Michael Bisping is the undisputed undefeated cleanweight champ. All these other guys stick needles up their asses.
 
(and fully agree that he straight-up lost to Hamill - Dana wanted that UK market so ... )

That's one problem with the 10-pt system. Hamill dominated one round, while losing as closely as possible the other 2.

On another side, I remember a lot of people claiming Bisping should have won the decision against Rashad
 
Leben, Kang and Miller were all good fighters for their time as was Sinosic.

(and fully agree that he straight-up lost to Hamill - Dana wanted that UK market so ... )

Agree with a lot of your post but Sinisic was 7-9 and 1-5 in the UFC when they fought. And Elvis rocked him early and to his credit Bisping came back and won (similar to the early dominance of Kang until he looked gassed in the 2nd round).

Ha mill won, though you could argue hard for him beating Rashad - the latter was a painfully boring fight as Shad was a blanket.
 
well at that time he was just an up and coming fighter, the Hendo fight was his first title eliminator

so no, his record is not padded
Fair enough, but that can be said about most fighters early in their careers, especially fighters that have been around as long as Bisping.

Leben, Kang and Miller were all good fighters for their time as was Sinosic.

(and fully agree that he straight-up lost to Hamill - Dana wanted that UK market so ... )
Yea every fighter that's been around a while has started their career against lower tier guys. And I'm not trying to say that Bisping hasn't had a good career. Just the 20 wins thing is a bit padded, where he was fighting a lot of low tier, never gonna make it guys, while being in UFC. If you look at the first 10 fights of most other guys in the UFC, you aren't going to see a bunch of fighters that never made it. Look at Franklin or Silva's first 10 UFC fights, just to compare champions from the same division.
 
Back
Top