Not looking to write a novel, but I see too many people overlooking how critical match-ups are in the outcomes of fights.
A large portion of people are extrapolating that Eddie Alvarez will beat Conor McGregor based on McGregor's performance against Nate Diaz.
Using this logic is faulty for two key reasons:
A large portion of people are extrapolating that Eddie Alvarez will beat Conor McGregor based on McGregor's performance against Nate Diaz.
Using this logic is faulty for two key reasons:
- Most people view Nate as a lightweight who isn't top-level in the division which is actually inaccurate. He's hovered in or around the top 10 at LW for ~ 5 years now and actually cracked the top 5 on a few occasions. In short, Nate is an excellent LHW
- Nate has a style that is very difficult for a guy like Conor McGregor. When you look at pretty much everyone who has beaten Nate, the common denominator is that they were very strong grapplers. They had to be able to either take Nate down and neutralize is jiu-jitsu or at least posses a good enough guard to negate Nate's top attack. Why is this critical? Because Nate's combo of boxing, cardio, and durability enable him to stand and bang with anyone at LHW. As you'll see from reviewing his losses, nobody (not even RDA) chose to trade with Nate. Pretty much everyone one of them used offensive wrestling, leg kicks, GnP, and some occasion setup strikes to control Nate.
- Overconfident in his power
- Under conditioned for a stand-up war
- Smaller in terms of reach and height making it riskier and more energy intensive to engage
- Underestimated Nate's durability
- Couldn't mount any reasonable grappling offense or defense allowing Nate to focus on turning the match into a war of attrition
- He's smaller in terms of height and reach
- His chin is not capable of taking Conor's best shots
- His striking is very unrefined meaning that Conor will easily be able to pick him apart
- You could argue that he's lost 4 out of his last 5 fights since 3 of his wins are split decisions where a real judge actually scores you as losing the fight. Yes, I fully understand that he did get the win, but when fights are so close where winning or losing depends on a judges biases, it's not a very reassuring win.
- He may get caught off guard by Conor taking him down since it's almost guaranteed that he'll be most concerned with getting tagged by Conor. Why? Because he doesn't have anywhere near the guard of Nate Diaz so Conor knows that a surprise takedown could mean Eddie is on his back for a whole round