- Joined
- Sep 27, 2016
- Messages
- 2,350
- Reaction score
- 0
And not because he was picked to front the organization’s first show in New York City after state laws were changed to allow it.
It is because he is allowed to do pretty much whatever he likes.
McGregor will attempt to become the first fighter to hold two UFC belts simultaneously when he challenges lightweight titleholder Eddie Alvarez at Madison Square Garden, which would be a great achievement if it was not completely unfair.
To be clear, Alvarez vs. McGregor is an appealing and potentially thrilling fight, well worthy of being the centerpiece of what promises to be a huge night for the sport.
However, the decision to allow McGregor to keep hold of his featherweight belt is nothing short of absurd.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...-new-york-lightweight-eddie-alvarez/91163838/
While I do agree that McCashCow is getting very special treatment, it's a business and Conor puts butts in seats. Relax, Conor-haters, it will all be better once he loses his belt(s). Until then, enjoy the ride.
It is because he is allowed to do pretty much whatever he likes.
McGregor will attempt to become the first fighter to hold two UFC belts simultaneously when he challenges lightweight titleholder Eddie Alvarez at Madison Square Garden, which would be a great achievement if it was not completely unfair.
To be clear, Alvarez vs. McGregor is an appealing and potentially thrilling fight, well worthy of being the centerpiece of what promises to be a huge night for the sport.
However, the decision to allow McGregor to keep hold of his featherweight belt is nothing short of absurd.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...-new-york-lightweight-eddie-alvarez/91163838/
While I do agree that McCashCow is getting very special treatment, it's a business and Conor puts butts in seats. Relax, Conor-haters, it will all be better once he loses his belt(s). Until then, enjoy the ride.