- Joined
- May 29, 2009
- Messages
- 12,950
- Reaction score
- 1,354
Which do you prefer?
Both are understandable.
I honestly like the to be the best mind frame.
Obviously, getting paid is important but it was better when fighters were looking to become the best or fight the best to take their spots.
Cloner, whether intended or not, has spear headed a movement where fighters are doing their best to pick and choose opponents (T-wood, Alvarez, Pena, etc.) based solely off the profit.
If you generalize that mentality, it becomes a bunch of fights where Champions could be facing people outside the top 10 or not the number 1, 2 or even 3 contenders. Connie vs. Nasty Nate I and II are examples. Both fights were pointless.
Which do you prefer?
Both are understandable.
I honestly like the to be the best mind frame.
Obviously, getting paid is important but it was better when fighters were looking to become the best or fight the best to take their spots.
Cloner, whether intended or not, has spear headed a movement where fighters are doing their best to pick and choose opponents (T-wood, Alvarez, Pena, etc.) based solely off the profit.
If you generalize that mentality, it becomes a bunch of fights where Champions could be facing people outside the top 10 or not the number 1, 2 or even 3 contenders. Connie vs. Nasty Nate I and II are examples. Both fights were pointless.
Which do you prefer?