- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Messages
- 14,920
- Reaction score
- 2,509
On Schaub's recent podcast he said he could understand Jones getting a lenient suspension, but not Brock because Brock took CLOMIPHENE (he really stressed the word to imply its obvious association with PED use)! A few seconds later his producer mentions that Jones tested positive for both clomiphene and letrozole, so to save face Schaub effortlessly transitioned to "Brock still deserves a harsher sentence cuz he's from WWE", in other words that USADA should use his WWE association to assume guilt of steroid use, whereas Jones is an MMA fighter (where PED use is ultra rare of course) so their penalties should be quite different.
Has anyone noticed a spike in overall MMA related propaganda recently? WME public relations must be behind it.
Has anyone noticed a spike in overall MMA related propaganda recently? WME public relations must be behind it.
Last edited: