Brock Lesnar Has Lost A Lot Of Muscle Mass

Blackjack

Black Belt
@Black
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
5,874
Reaction score
1
brock-lesnar.jpg Lots of people are making the accusation that Brock Lesnar has been using steroids all his life. If the USADA findings are made public we'll know if he was on steroids for UFC 200 or not but he's clearly lost a lot of muscle mass compared to early in his pro wrestling career. Just look at how he used to look compared to now. he had a lot more mass, especially in his legs. If he did use steroids recently it was just for UFC 200. he doesn't do them for his WWE job. In fact, he usually wears a shirt in all his WWE appearances now and over the last several years. Back when this picture was taken he never wore a shirt for his WWE appearances, was aways tanned, and had a lot more mass.
 
Just because he lost muscle mass doesn't mean he hasn't been on them forever. He actually looked more jacked at UFC 200 than he had in his previous fights
 
I suspect age has more to do with it than PED usage.
 
Of course he has lost muscles.. he probably have 10 years less then now in this picture. PED or not yr body changes i guess.
 
The photo is confusing you. He hasn't lost any muscle mass whatsoever. The tattoos are covering his muscles.
 
Yeah he's not as jacked at 40 as he used to be. Shocking isn't it?
 
He seemed to lean out a bit after he botched that moonsault.
 
Tests back then would have shown some interesting resaults
 
Probably switched to a different protein powder.
 
Looks like he lost some years too. His heart will explode at 45
 
he looked like a deflated balloon after his first ufc run

then surprise surprise he got back after going back to the wwe
 
Obviously he cant be as big as he is in the wwe since the maximum weight limit in the ufc is 265 so he has to get down to that weight. Hes still huge as fuck and barely smaller than he is in the pic in the op, just more cut if anything. Theres no doubt hes been roiding for decades.

brock-lesnar-ufc.jpg
 
He was not bigger then than he is now, no chance. He may be more toned now but the width and thickness he has is greater now I'd say. (width and thickness said in a totally heterosexual way:)
 
View attachment 124599 Lots of people are making the accusation that Brock Lesnar has been using steroids all his life. If the USADA findings are made public we'll know if he was on steroids for UFC 200 or not but he's clearly lost a lot of muscle mass compared to early in his pro wrestling career. Just look at how he used to look compared to now. he had a lot more mass, especially in his legs. If he did use steroids recently it was just for UFC 200. he doesn't do them for his WWE job. In fact, he usually wears a shirt in all his WWE appearances now and over the last several years. Back when this picture was taken he never wore a shirt for his WWE appearances, was aways tanned, and had a lot more mass.

He looked like that for like 3 months into his WWE run. His body has always changed pretty drastically.

Here is Lesnar from 2013

tumblr_mkwyk82dxz1rpf6y8o1_500.png
 
View attachment 124599 Lots of people are making the accusation that Brock Lesnar has been using steroids all his life. If the USADA findings are made public we'll know if he was on steroids for UFC 200 or not but he's clearly lost a lot of muscle mass compared to early in his pro wrestling career. Just look at how he used to look compared to now. he had a lot more mass, especially in his legs. If he did use steroids recently it was just for UFC 200. he doesn't do them for his WWE job. In fact, he usually wears a shirt in all his WWE appearances now and over the last several years. Back when this picture was taken he never wore a shirt for his WWE appearances, was aways tanned, and had a lot more mass.


You do understand he has to cut weight to make the 265 limit, right? He is much heavier in the WWE.

You're argument is insanely backwards.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,234,241
Messages
55,267,270
Members
174,714
Latest member
F5CHAMPIONSHIP
Back
Top