If Mark Hunt continued the same lifestyle/training but on PEDs, how does a rematch vs a roided...

lecter

not even webscale
@Silver
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
11,265
Reaction score
0
... Brock Lesnar go?

Same Mark Hunt but he's free to inject whatever he wants.
Brock also continues to take whatever he wants.

Would the fight go any different, if yes how and why?
 
mods add a poll plz!

  1. Lesnar beats him again because he's an A-level athlete!
  2. Mark knocks him out, he has more power on steroids, Brock is a fake wrestler!
  3. Draw!
 
as long as hunt used the same shit as brock, and also peds that help with stamina he could have won by throwning more than 5 punches the whole fight.
 
His weight cut may have been easier.
But what would he have to complain about after the loss?
 
... Brock Lesnar go?

Same Mark Hunt but he's free to inject whatever he wants.
Brock also continues to take whatever he wants.

Would the fight go any different, if yes how and why?
It looks identical. Hunt has absolutely nothing for Lesnar. Dude was so terrified of the take down that he lost the striking battle to Brock fucking Lesnar. Are you kidding me? Lol!!!
 
His weight cut may have been easier.
But what would he have to complain about after the loss?

when did he complain about bad losses? he lost to sean mccorkle. hes only unhappy because brock got paid a lot more even though he cheated and ufc exempted brock from same usada testing process.
 
He doesn't need steroids, he needed to be less tentative.
 
There is no doubt Hunto is a better striker and would certainly KO Lesnar in a boxing match.

However, in their UFC match, Lesnar exposed Hunto's non-existent TDD.

So, if Hunto doesn't somehow miraculously improve his TDD, the fight most likely goes the same way, regardless of PED use.
 
Lesnar was roided? I thought he was on estrogen blockers? Which is what you take in order to not grow titties when you stop taking the steroids.....?
 
Back
Top