- Joined
- Oct 9, 2003
- Messages
- 2,511
- Reaction score
- 5
in regards of his first fight with Nate. The argument that is mostly used is how he "completely dominated" Nate before he gassed. If he could've kept that up, he'd have destroyed Nate.
That was basically the argument for Overeem for years pre Econoreem. He would completely dominate basically everyone the first round (or few minutes). If he wouldn't overwhelm someone, he'd gas and loses.
So in regards to logic and the sake of argument, what exactly is the difference between the two?
Overeem eventually changed his approach., which led to his current winning streak (most feel his old strategy would definately get him KTFO'd by JDS). Conor basically said he'd come better prepared this time and plans on doing what he was doing the first round (starts at 11:52):
Will he have the cardio to keep that up? We'll see.
That was basically the argument for Overeem for years pre Econoreem. He would completely dominate basically everyone the first round (or few minutes). If he wouldn't overwhelm someone, he'd gas and loses.
So in regards to logic and the sake of argument, what exactly is the difference between the two?
Overeem eventually changed his approach., which led to his current winning streak (most feel his old strategy would definately get him KTFO'd by JDS). Conor basically said he'd come better prepared this time and plans on doing what he was doing the first round (starts at 11:52):
Will he have the cardio to keep that up? We'll see.
Last edited: