- Joined
- Mar 26, 2014
- Messages
- 5,028
- Reaction score
- 583
I've discussed this in a few semi-related threads but figured it could use its own.
I've said for years that the UFC's business model is to have young, hungry, cheap fighter fill events and fight for peanuts without complaining. UFC loves young Brazilians for this purpose. Sprinkle in a few big-name guys here and there who actually want to get paid to put on the top of the card. Then put all of the mid-tier guys who make decent money on the shelf and act like they don't exist. If you start browsing fight finder, you can find tons of guys who are fighting only 3-4 times every 2-3 years. Then you can find a lot of the new guys who make crap tend to fight as often as possible, 3-4 times in a year.
For example, UFC had Rothwell on ice forever, basically ruined a huge portion of his career (7 fights in 5 years) until he beat so many guys the fans demanded he fight more. That's because Rothwell was one of the mid-tier guys who made decent money. Meanwhile they found time to give Soa Polalei four fights in ten months. The difference? Soa had just come to the UFC and was making the minimum.
UFC is basically giving us a second-rate product on purpose while tying up a lot of the fighters who are better than the ones we're watching because it doesn't want to pay them. Anyone else notice this?
I've said for years that the UFC's business model is to have young, hungry, cheap fighter fill events and fight for peanuts without complaining. UFC loves young Brazilians for this purpose. Sprinkle in a few big-name guys here and there who actually want to get paid to put on the top of the card. Then put all of the mid-tier guys who make decent money on the shelf and act like they don't exist. If you start browsing fight finder, you can find tons of guys who are fighting only 3-4 times every 2-3 years. Then you can find a lot of the new guys who make crap tend to fight as often as possible, 3-4 times in a year.
For example, UFC had Rothwell on ice forever, basically ruined a huge portion of his career (7 fights in 5 years) until he beat so many guys the fans demanded he fight more. That's because Rothwell was one of the mid-tier guys who made decent money. Meanwhile they found time to give Soa Polalei four fights in ten months. The difference? Soa had just come to the UFC and was making the minimum.
UFC is basically giving us a second-rate product on purpose while tying up a lot of the fighters who are better than the ones we're watching because it doesn't want to pay them. Anyone else notice this?