ON what EFFIN planet is conor-nate a BETTER fight than bones-dc 2?

bjpenngoat

Silver Belt
@Silver
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,764
Reaction score
2,551
why the hell would anybody rather have a NON TITLE 5 round fight between two complete NON contenders at 170 over a TITLE fight between the two best lhws of all time.

Dana did the right thing, he can spread out the talent over two cards instead of stacking it on one and he would have had to make conor-nate the main event with two title fights piggy backing it. It made no sense and its better for business for the ufc to say our CHAMPIONSHIP fights have MORE value than a fan friendly fun fight.
 
Alpha centuri.

Google that shit.
 
Last edited:
For sure it's a more competitive fight, for much higher stakes, and more important in the MMA landscape.
 
Its only better for annoying ass conor fans who brag about how many PPV buys conor can bring in.
 
On the planet excitement because the first fight between Bones and Cormier was boring as fuck.
 
It's better on the planet of Conor fans and on the planet of Conor haters (for exactly opposite reasons). But it seems most of us live on one of the two.
 
Conor vs Nate was a more exciting fight than DC vs Jones. That's why.
 
Gonor'w little nuthuggers want to see him "avenge" his loss. He never will, since his dream was to be undefeated and retire in 2016, undefeated. loooooool

He's just a little guy that got beaten by a better fighter.
 
It's all about numbers. I sure as hell am more excited about seeing jones vs cormier, but the fact is conor would bring in a lot more viewers
 
Back
Top