IGIT
Silver Belt
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2005
- Messages
- 10,046
- Reaction score
- 940
I think we could conduct an experiment here. Let's all go enlist in the Army and insist that we bring our own rifles.
and camping gear.
militias = camping
- IGIT
I think we could conduct an experiment here. Let's all go enlist in the Army and insist that we bring our own rifles.
hi ReroutetoRemain,
why is what the Founders declared during post-colonial life so important to you? the injuns are conquered. England is not going think it over and try to retake the continent. we have around 800,000 LEOs in the country.
we're not depending on the Continental army to defend our homeland, we don't need men with sterno, Dinty Moore and deer rifles to protect us. our military force and nuclear arsenal is probably enough to incinerate the planet several times over.
at any rate, none of the august men you quote pictured this when they scribed their thoughts;
3rd Squad, 4th Platoon, Whale Company
- IGIT
You first. Please film it for posterity. Thanks.I think we could conduct an experiment here. Let's all go enlist in the Army and insist that we bring our own rifles.
logical restraint
An organized community working together intelligently brings together those that can fulfill those necessary roles so law and safety is maintained till official elements of these services arrive.
Such as?
Grenades, bombs, missile delivery systems, nukes, landmines, claymores, etc.....
If you read the quotes I posted, every one is mostly talking about a domestic threat of tyranny.
In the last 100 years how many have been slaughtered by their own governments?
What government hasn't abused it's people?
Why would you think governments are now past that?
I don't think missiles/bombs/nukes would be considered arms. The others people already can legally own with the right paperwork.
There is never any guarantee to safety. But preparedness is better than having to scramble after the fact or suffer the potential consequence of not being prepared. That is unless you completely trust everyone around you including those that aren't family or friends. Of course you could also live so remotely that it isn't much of an issue because human interaction simply isn't a factor.hey Teppodama,
i'm unclear what any of this has to do with militias. if you're talking about personal protection? sure.
the only way to really be safe is to have your gun and to keep it drawn, really, at all times and to wear kevlar. this has nothing at all to do with fat men in state parks swathed in the latest army/navy store couture.
Maybe if you had one they would have? And it doesn't always have to devolve to actual armed conflict. The threat of such can often be enough. All of our laws are at their most fundamental are backed by the threat of armed conflict. That's why we arm those we choose to enforce them.tell me about it, my friend.
black lives matter rioted down the street i live on, four blocks from my condo and wrecked the bar next to my studio.
look, when the militia swoops in and saves the day, tell me about it. i am all ears.
That would really depend on how literally an individual believes in the sanctity of their rights and how far their convictions extent to protecting them now wouldn't it? Does that mean I advocate drawing down on everyone looking to nibble on the 2nd? No, there is an obvious and lawful chain of events that extend before such a drastic and usually irrevocable decision, or at the very least should be for anyone acting in good faith. Most of those revolve around seeking resource through our system of laws. But what do you do if you believe the law is not impartial? Will not listen to your grievance and give it due consideration and that actions resulting from said law are unjust?gun rights expanded under President Obama.
and what are you driving at, anyway?
are you saying that if congress convenes and two parties bilaterally decide to write into law severe 2nd amendment restrictions because that is what the nation at large demands, that militias are going to shoot LEOs, Federal agents, and elected representatives? and that this would be justified?
lol.
- IGIT
I don't think missiles/bombs/nukes would be considered arms. The others people already can legally own with the right paperwork.
There is never any guarantee to safety. But preparedness is better than having to scramble after the fact or suffer the potential consequence of not being prepared. That is unless you completely trust everyone around you including those that aren't family or friends. Of course you could also live so remotely that it isn't much of an issue because human interaction simply isn't a factor.
Maybe if you had one they would have? And it doesn't always have to devolve to actual armed conflict. The threat of such can often be enough. All of our laws are at their most fundamental are backed by the threat of armed conflict. That's why we arm those we choose to enforce them.
But what do you do if you believe the law is not impartial? Will not listen to your grievance and give it due consideration and that actions resulting from said law are unjust?
You can keep saying that as much as you want but that doesn't make the statement true and it doesn't deal with the complete reasoning for a militia as outlined in our constitution or why those very reasons will always be valid.hi again RerouteToRemain,
i hear you loud and clear, my friend. as i've been saying, the primary rationale behind militias is to prepare for the day where patriots will be forced to kill unpatriotic americans.
How much of what occurred under those regimes would have been able to be accomplished to the degree they were accomplished had they recourse to arms from the outset?off the top of my head, there's Mao's Great Leap Forward. Assad seems to be doing a good job in killing his citizenry. Jews certainly could have mounted a spirited defense against the Luftwaffe if they'd only had some deer rifles and Dinty Moore, i guess?
One certainly hopes not but we certainly hear a lot of bluster from our politicians and media about how Trump is one questionable decision away from becoming such now don't we? Maybe only non-Democratic Presidents and politicians are capable of becoming such huh? Maybe it's "non-intellectuals" that only succumb to the temptation right? Certainly no modern educated man or woman would right?i could go on, but what does this have to do with the United States of America? are you afraid that someone like Obama go insane, waking up one morning and deciding he's Pinochet?
Night Igit. Enjoy your evening and sleep well. Pleasure talking with you.hi Teppodama,
i live in a city. i am a city guy. lived in New York, then Philly, now Charlotte.
we city people don't do militias, i don't know what to tell you. not enough forests around to practice in or something.
maybe i would have what? drawn down on marauding rioters to protect my studio?
not a chance, lol.
i am insured, i am not some kind of barbarian.
listen, i am a normal, busy middle aged guy. i work, i try and go out to dinner if i can get a reservation at the right place, i see my girlfriend...i try to make time to see my parents. when i have time, i try to unwind a bit by posting here and reading a bit. i like to smoke high quality pot.
i don't have any time to go crawling around in the dirt, far from modern plumbing, in preparation to fight for the right to own firearms.
its not on my schedule, at all.
if the nation's senators and house members get together and decide for some reason to radically curtail the right to own firearms - one would assume they're not being whimsical for edgy reasons; it would be because a huge, overwhelming amount of Americans desire that kind of change.
if, in response to this kind of bilateral agreement, you feel you have the right to shoot Americans....idk what to say.
you seem like a good guy, Tep. good talking to you, i gotta run.
- IGIT
hi again RerouteToRemain,
i hear you loud and clear, my friend. as i've been saying, the primary rationale behind militias is to prepare for the day where patriots will be forced to kill unpatriotic americans.
i could go on, but what does this have to do with the United States of America? are you afraid that someone like Obama go insane, waking up one morning and deciding he's Pinochet?
- IGIT