- Joined
- Jan 15, 2009
- Messages
- 26,995
- Reaction score
- 22,044
What evidence is there to suggest the news would have buried his identity if he wasn't White?
Are you legit curious or trying to downplay the fact another white kid is a school shooter?
innocent until proven guilty is a legitimate argument and should be implemented when considering a minors name being released imoI honestly don't have a problem with releasing a murder suspects name whatever his age may be.
But I see your point.
innocent until proven guilty is a legitimate argument and should be implemented when considering a minors name being released imo
innocent until proven guilty is a legitimate argument and should be implemented when considering a minors name being released imo
I am legit curious. Do they normally broadcast kid murderers faces and names while they're still alleged a short while after an incident? Is this normal at all or am I asking the wrong person?
I'm pretty sure yes they do.
YesAm I wrong?
We are gonna need a non white school shooter to know for sure.
Haven't searched but I can't remember one that wasn't white.
Wtf is with white kids and school shooting? It always seem to be a white kid doing this crime
What do we class Asians as ? I always just kind of thought of them as white.The most prolific school shooting in the US was perpetrated by a Korean
No; they're AsianWhat do we class Asians as ? I always just kind of thought of them as white.
If he was anything but white, you wouldn't have heard a thing about his name or religion or race. Gotta protect those Muslims and keep the narrative flowing!https://www.yahoo.com/news/student-...l-shooting-blamed-bullying-001019515.htmlhtml
Caption to the full color photo in the article:
"Alleged Freeman High School shooter Caleb Sharpe, 15, is escorted from the Public Safety Building to the Juvenile Detention Center, in Spokane, Washington, U.S., September 13, 2017. Courtesy Colin Mulvany/The Spokesman-Review"
- The above is Rueters, so hundreds if not thousands of news outlets carried the story as is, unedited throughout the world.
Simple question, would this 15 year old alleged perpetrator be treated the same way if he was any other race or had a name associated to another religion?
I can imagine many news outlets covering the shooting using this Reuters article might have considered "Ha, Suck It White 'Christians!'" before disappointedly leaving the big reveal for the prominent, uncensored picture.
I myself think murderers are too protected, even as 15 year olds. But the fact that I heard this one's identity revealed over the radio a couple of days ago leapt out at me as selective. Am I wrong?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/student-...l-shooting-blamed-bullying-001019515.htmlhtml
Caption to the full color photo in the article:
"Alleged Freeman High School shooter Caleb Sharpe, 15, is escorted from the Public Safety Building to the Juvenile Detention Center, in Spokane, Washington, U.S., September 13, 2017. Courtesy Colin Mulvany/The Spokesman-Review"
- The above is Rueters, so hundreds if not thousands of news outlets carried the story as is, unedited throughout the world.
Simple question, would this 15 year old alleged perpetrator be treated the same way if he was any other race or had a name associated to another religion?
I can imagine many news outlets covering the shooting using this Reuters article might have considered "Ha, Suck It White 'Christians!'" before disappointedly leaving the big reveal for the prominent, uncensored picture.
I myself think murderers are too protected, even as 15 year olds. But the fact that I heard this one's identity revealed over the radio a couple of days ago leapt out at me as selective. Am I wrong?
That is very strange. In fact I think it might be against the law.
@panamaican
Is it illegal to broadcast the identity of a minor?