Originally Posted by RepairManManMan
Butterbean was a novelty fighter.
Tyson was a ranked contender, there is a difference.
I don't know anything about Butterbean other than the fact that he knocked out Bart Gunn at WrestleMania. I have no idea why people watched him, or if many people watched him. I have no idea if "Toughman reporter calls Butterbean the Mike Tyson of Toughman contests" would get so many angry replies from people who clearly didn't even watch the video. I also don't care.
Ariel compared Ronda to Tyson in that the people who pay for her fights don't feel ripped off when she finishes them in a matter of seconds, because that's what they're buying them for in the first place. He compared that to how people didn't feel ripped off when Tyson finished fights in the first round because that's what they were tuning in to see. He contrasted that to people feeling gypped when fights they pay for end quickly when it's other fighters. That was the beginning and the end of the comparison.