Originally Posted by PRIDEoftheUFC
I thought Lyoto definitely won that decision, but in my personal rankings i'd still have Phil ranked over him because no matter what we think, he's got the win on his record. But yeah it's strange how they have Phil over Lyoto but still had Evans over Nogueira even though he lost to diet nog.
Are you proposing that the only consideration for rankings should be the W-L record, disregarding incompetent or corrupt judging? If pretty much everyone, media and casual observers alike, agree that fighter A won EVERY round of a fight, three incompetent and/or corrupt judges shouldn't override logic. There has to be a point where we collectively say that a decision goes beyond subjectivity and ventures into incompetence or corruption, at which point the judges' decision should basically be ignored.
Long before I was an MMA fan, I was a diehard boxing fan. People talk a lot about the death of boxing, usually in reference to corrupt sanctioning bodies and promoters. But what doesn't get enough attention is the absolutely HORRID judging that takes place. For me personally, the incompetent/corrupt judging in boxing is one of the things that most turned me off about the sport. If we want to avoid this fate in MMA, we need to hold the judges accountable. At a certain point, we need to say that certain decisions are too obviously wrong to receive any credence. The attitudes of "I know it's wrong, but the W-L record is all that matters" or "don't leave it in the hands of the judges" is far too complicit and only makes the problem worse.