Originally Posted by 613
How did i get proven wrong?
You lost all credibility when you said "it wouldnt surprise me if Paul Daley would KO Woodley"
You claimed Diaz had NEVER beaten a fighter as good as Woodley. I first said Lawler. You said that didnt count because it was too long ago. Next you're saying "a win is a win" when someone else points out that Woodley laying on Daley for 3 rounds wasn't anything to be proud of. Try not being such a hypocrite next time.
Lawler was hot shit in the UFC back then too, buddy. Sure he's not the same fighter today but no one is from year to year or even one fight to the next. Lawler has a lot of losses on his record. It doesn't change the fact he's been a better fighter than Woodley.