Originally Posted by dirtypablo
Its relevant because I want you guys to admit that even when its the word of 5 people against one, you would most likely believe the one if its a woman claiming she was raped.
it's not relevant because your scenario is "in a case with no other info
besides the words of the people involved. but there IS other info that is evidence to rape.
a more accurate scenario would be
"if there was five guys and a girl that all went into an apartment togetrher and don't come out until the next day. the girl leaves with a busted lip and claims she was raped. she went to a doctor and the doctor agreed that shows signs that are virtually always a result of vaginal rape. but all the guys claim the sex was consensual except 1, who pleads guilty to attempted rape. would you believe her?"